Apache HopvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Hop | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in ETL | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 514 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +38 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Hop scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Hop.
If you want the quickest setup, Apache Hop is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Apache Hop is growing faster right now (+38 stars in 30 days).
Apache Hop details →Windows ARM details →