# Apache Hop vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Hop | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in ETL | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 1 514 | 132 757 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +38 | +3 302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1469 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | b11985 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 64/100 for Apache Hop, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1469 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Hop.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Hop](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-hop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-hop.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-hop-vs-llamacpp