# Apache Cassandra vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 ✓ | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +100 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-zammad