Apache CassandravsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →Zammad details →