Apache CassandravsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →UUSEC WAF details →