# Apache Cassandra vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 128 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.

If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.

Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-trip2g