Apache CassandravsTRAWL
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | TRAWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #11 of 16 in Web Scraping |
| GitHub stars | 10 127 | 1 081 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.9.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 56/100 for TRAWL, so it is the safer default.
TRAWL ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, TRAWL is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →TRAWL details →