# Apache Cassandra vs Trac

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | Trac |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 7 in Issue Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 10 127 ✓ | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Java | — |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 65/100 for Trac, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Trac is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.

Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [Trac](https://selfhost.directory/project/trac) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trac.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-trac