# Apache Cassandra vs Tidal Echo

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | Tidal Echo |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #61 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 ✓ | 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | HTML |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 47/100 for Tidal Echo, so it is the safer default.

Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [Tidal Echo](https://selfhost.directory/project/tidal-echo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tidal-echo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-tidal-echo