Apache CassandravsPinchflat
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | Pinchflat | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #13 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 5 431 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 65/100 for Pinchflat, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Pinchflat is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Pinchflat is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →Pinchflat details →