# Apache Cassandra vs PairDrop

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | PairDrop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 10 125 | 11 711 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +23 | +252 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

PairDrop scores 75/100 against 74/100 for Apache Cassandra, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, PairDrop is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.

PairDrop is growing faster right now (+252 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [PairDrop](https://selfhost.directory/project/pairdrop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pairdrop.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-pairdrop