# Apache Cassandra vs OctoBot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | OctoBot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 ✓ | 6 872 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +257 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.

OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.

If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.

OctoBot is growing faster right now (+257 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [OctoBot](https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/octobot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-octobot