# Apache Cassandra vs Lumabri

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | Lumabri |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #5 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 ✓ | 202 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.

Lumabri ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.

Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [Lumabri](https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-lumabri