Apache CassandravsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →LubeLogger details →