# Apache Cassandra vs hls-restream-proxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Cassandra | hls-restream-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #42 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 ✓ | 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 46/100 for hls-restream-proxy, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, hls-restream-proxy is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.

Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Cassandra](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-cassandra.md)
- [hls-restream-proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-cassandra-vs-hls-restream-proxy