Apache Cassandravsgrafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 77 576 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +702 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 53 |
| Latest release | — | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
grafana scores 90/100 against 74/100 for Apache Cassandra, so it is the safer default.
grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, grafana is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
grafana is growing faster right now (+702 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →grafana details →