# Apache Airflow vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-woodpecker-ci