# Apache Airflow vs windmill

> Two self-hosted [Workflow Automation projects](https://selfhost.directory/workflow-automation), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 18 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 ✓ | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 161 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.851.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 77/100 for windmill, so it is the safer default.

windmill ships more often: 161 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, windmill is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [windmill](https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-windmill