# Apache Airflow vs Wiki.js

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | Wiki.js |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 29 103 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 ✓ | +146 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 7 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.315 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 77/100 for Wiki.js, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Wiki.js is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [Wiki.js](https://selfhost.directory/project/wikijs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wikijs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-wikijs