# Apache Airflow vs wanderer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 299 ✓ | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +342 ✓ | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.

wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+342 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [wanderer](https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wanderer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-wanderer