Apache AirflowvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →UUSEC WAF details →