# Apache Airflow vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 47 306 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +340 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+340 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-tube-archivist