Apache Airflowvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 47 299 | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +342 | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+342 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →transfer.sh details →