# Apache Airflow vs traefik-crowdsec-bouncer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | traefik-crowdsec-bouncer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #64 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 41/100 for traefik-crowdsec-bouncer, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for traefik-crowdsec-bouncer.

If you want the quickest setup, traefik-crowdsec-bouncer is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [traefik-crowdsec-bouncer](https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik-crowdsec-bouncer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/traefik-crowdsec-bouncer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-traefik-crowdsec-bouncer