# Apache Airflow vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 304 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +338 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+338 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-syncwatch