# Apache Airflow vs Standard Notes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | Standard Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 ✓ | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 70/100 for Standard Notes, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [Standard Notes](https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/standard-notes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-standard-notes