# Apache Airflow vs SeaGOAT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | SeaGOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 6 in Code Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 306 ✓ | 1 316 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +340 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.6.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 53/100 for SeaGOAT, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for SeaGOAT.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaGOAT is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+340 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [SeaGOAT](https://selfhost.directory/project/seagoat) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seagoat.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-seagoat