# Apache Airflow vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-scada-lts