# Apache Airflow vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 47 308 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +342 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+342 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-qwc2