# Apache Airflow vs porta

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | porta |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.

porta ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, porta is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [porta](https://selfhost.directory/project/porta) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/porta.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-porta