# Apache Airflow vs OTOBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | OTOBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 47 308 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +342 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+342 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [OTOBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/otobo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otobo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-otobo