# Apache Airflow vs OtoDock

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | OtoDock |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #104 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 ✓ | 193 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.9.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 49/100 for OtoDock, so it is the safer default.

OtoDock ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, OtoDock is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [OtoDock](https://selfhost.directory/project/oto-dock) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/oto-dock.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-oto-dock