# Apache Airflow vs ontime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | ontime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #3 of 11 in Event Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 307 ✓ | 969 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +341 ✓ | +13 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.

ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+341 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [ontime](https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ontime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-ontime