# Apache Airflow vs nati.ve

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | nati.ve |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #21 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 47 302 ✓ | 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +336 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 48/100 for nati.ve, so it is the safer default.

Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nati.ve.

If you want the quickest setup, nati.ve is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+336 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [nati.ve](https://selfhost.directory/project/native) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/native.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-native