# Apache Airflow vs minutes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Apache Airflow | minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #16 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 47 302 ✓ | 1 577 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +336 ✓ | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 52 ✓ |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.31.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 61/100 for minutes, so it is the safer default.

minutes ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.

If you want the quickest setup, minutes is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.

Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+336 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Apache Airflow](https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/apache-airflow.md)
- [minutes](https://selfhost.directory/project/minutes) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/minutes.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/apache-airflow-vs-minutes