# Anubis vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Anubis | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 23 779 | 93 035 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 143 | +1 288 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Anubis needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Anubis](https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/anubis-vs-uptime-kuma