# Anubis vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Anubis | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 23 789 | 56 869 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 153 ✓ | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.

Anubis ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Anubis needs more configuration.

Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Anubis](https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/anubis-vs-typst