# Anubis vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Anubis | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 23 802 ✓ | 16 649 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 151 ✓ | +250 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Anubis scores 80/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.

If you want the quickest setup, Anubis is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 151 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Anubis](https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/anubis-vs-trigger