# Anubis vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Anubis | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 23 789 | 35 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 153 ✓ | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.

## Details

- [Anubis](https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/anubis.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/anubis-vs-seaweedfs