# Antragsgrün / Motion.Tools vs penpot

> Two self-hosted [Collaboration projects](https://selfhost.directory/collaboration), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Antragsgrün / Motion.Tools | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #20 of 30 in Collaboration | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 150 | 61 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 482 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.18.0 · 11 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 47/100 for Antragsgrün / Motion.Tools, so it is the safer default.

penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Antragsgrün / Motion.Tools.

If you want the quickest setup, Antragsgrün / Motion.Tools is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Antragsgrün / Motion.Tools](https://selfhost.directory/project/antragsgrn-motiontools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/antragsgrn-motiontools.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/antragsgrn-motiontools-vs-penpot