# anarlog vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | anarlog | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 9 621 ✓ | 8 067 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +160 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.34 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 70/100 for anarlog, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for anarlog.

If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [anarlog](https://selfhost.directory/project/anarlog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/anarlog.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/anarlog-vs-woodpecker-ci