# amurex-backend vs DeepSeek Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | amurex-backend | DeepSeek Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 37/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #99 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 145 | 264 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 660 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 37/100 for amurex-backend, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; amurex-backend needs more configuration.

DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [amurex-backend](https://selfhost.directory/project/amurex-backend) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/amurex-backend.md)
- [DeepSeek Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/deepseek-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/amurex-backend-vs-deepseek-harness