# amneziawg-installer vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | amneziawg-installer | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #23 of 56 in VPN | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 426 | 61 544 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v6.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 58/100 for amneziawg-installer, so it is the safer default.

amneziawg-installer ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, amneziawg-installer is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [amneziawg-installer](https://selfhost.directory/project/amneziawg-installer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/amneziawg-installer.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/amneziawg-installer-vs-pi-hole