AListvsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AList | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in File Management | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 50 373 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.66.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
AList scores 83/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
AList ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, AList is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
AList is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
AList details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep AList, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with