# airbyte vs Navidrome Music Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | airbyte | Navidrome Music Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Engineering | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 22 285 | 24 424 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +151 | +649 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Navidrome Music Server scores 79/100 against 75/100 for airbyte, so it is the safer default.

Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for airbyte.

If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; airbyte needs more configuration.

Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+649 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [airbyte](https://selfhost.directory/project/airbyte) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/airbyte.md)
- [Navidrome Music Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/navidrome-music-server.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/airbyte-vs-navidrome-music-server