# airbyte vs GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | airbyte | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Engineering | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 22 282 ✓ | 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +156 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

airbyte scores 75/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.

GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for airbyte.

airbyte is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [airbyte](https://selfhost.directory/project/airbyte) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/airbyte.md)
- [GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/airbyte-vs-clickhouse-etl