# AIOStreams vs copyparty

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AIOStreams | copyparty |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 3 045 | 47 169 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +321 | +396 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 56 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.37.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

copyparty scores 82/100 against 72/100 for AIOStreams, so it is the safer default.

AIOStreams ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.

If you want the quickest setup, AIOStreams is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.

## Details

- [AIOStreams](https://selfhost.directory/project/aiostreams) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/aiostreams.md)
- [copyparty](https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/copyparty.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/aiostreams-vs-copyparty