AIOStreamsvscopyparty
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AIOStreams | copyparty | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 3 042 | 47 163 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +318 | +390 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 56 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.37.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 72/100 for AIOStreams, so it is the safer default.
AIOStreams ships more often: 56 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, AIOStreams is easier to run; copyparty needs more configuration.
AIOStreams details →copyparty details →
Swap a project
Keep AIOStreams, compare it with
Keep copyparty, compare it with