# ai-agent-automation vs Sim

> Two self-hosted [n8n alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/n8n), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ai-agent-automation | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #21 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #13 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 177 | 29 932 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +218 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 165 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 12 Sept 2026 | v0.9.36 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Sim scores 77/100 against 46/100 for ai-agent-automation, so it is the safer default.

Sim ships more often: 165 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for ai-agent-automation.

If you want the quickest setup, Sim is easier to run; ai-agent-automation needs more configuration.

Sim is growing faster right now (+218 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ai-agent-automation](https://selfhost.directory/project/ai-agent-automation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ai-agent-automation.md)
- [Sim](https://selfhost.directory/project/sim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ai-agent-automation-vs-sim