AgenticSeekvsOpenTTD
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AgenticSeek | OpenTTD | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #12 of 120 in AI Assistant | #1 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 27 562 | 8 434 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | 15.3 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenTTD scores 73/100 against 70/100 for AgenticSeek, so it is the safer default.
OpenTTD ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AgenticSeek.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenTTD is easier to run; AgenticSeek needs more configuration.
OpenTTD is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
AgenticSeek details →OpenTTD details →
Swap a project
Keep AgenticSeek, compare it with
Keep OpenTTD, compare it with